Nursing Elites

1. Which of the following can cause negative effects on decision making among groups?

• A. Rationalization
• B. Groupthink
• C. Risky shift
• D. Dialectical inquiry

Correct answer: B

Rationale: The correct answer is B: Groupthink. Groupthink is a negative phenomenon occurring in highly cohesive, isolated groups where members tend to think alike, which hinders critical thinking and can lead to poor decision-making. Rationalization refers to justifying or explaining behaviors or decisions in a logical manner. Risky shift is a phenomenon in groups where decisions become riskier or more extreme than individual members would make on their own. Dialectical inquiry is a technique used to counteract groupthink by encouraging debate and presenting opposing viewpoints to arrive at more thoughtful decisions.

2. Achieving Magnet Hospital designation offers hospitals the following advantages: (Select one that does not apply.)

• A. Greater client satisfaction.
• B. Improved nursing recruitment.
• C. Greater client workload.
• D. Nurses who are independent decision makers.

Correct answer: C

Rationale: The correct answer is C. Achieving Magnet Hospital designation provides advantages such as greater client satisfaction, improved nursing recruitment, and nurses who are independent decision makers. However, the statement about 'Greater client workload' is not a typical advantage associated with Magnet recognition. Organizations that achieve Magnet recognition focus on improving nursing work environments, empowering nurses, and enhancing patient care quality, rather than increasing client workload. Therefore, C is the correct choice. Choices A, B, and D are incorrect because they align with the benefits of achieving Magnet Hospital designation as they lead to increased satisfaction, better recruitment, and more empowered nurses.

3. One of the steps in coaching is often overlooked and taken for granted. What is this step?

• A. Stating the target
• B. Jumping to conclusions
• C. Asking for suggestions
• D. Tying the problem to clients' care

Correct answer: D

Rationale: In coaching, tying the problem to clients' care is crucial but often overlooked. This step ensures that the coach and the client focus on issues directly impacting the client's well-being. Stating the target (choice A) is important but not as critical as tying the problem to clients' care. Jumping to conclusions (choice B) is counterproductive in coaching as it may lead to incorrect assumptions. Asking for suggestions (choice C) is valuable, but it does not address the core aspect of linking the issue to the client's care, which is essential for effective coaching.

4. An RN is working through an ethical dilemma involving a patient on his unit. He has just identified the decision makers involved. Which step best describes the current stage the RN is working through?

• A. Assessment
• B. Diagnosis
• C. Planning
• D. Implementation

Correct answer: C

Rationale: The correct answer is C: Planning. In the planning phase of addressing an ethical dilemma, the goals of treatment are established, decision makers are identified, and all available options are reviewed. The assessment phase involves collecting data and information, the diagnosis phase involves analyzing the information to identify the problem, and the implementation phase involves carrying out the chosen plan of action. Therefore, in this scenario, where decision makers are being identified, the RN is in the planning stage.

5. The process by which registered nurses assess and judge the performance of peers against some predetermined standard is called:

• A. Group evaluation.
• B. Peer review.
• C. Forced distribution evaluation.
• D. Essay evaluation.

Correct answer: B

Rationale: The correct answer is B: Peer review. Peer review is a process in which professional peers assess and judge the performance of their colleagues against predetermined standards. Essay evaluations involve describing an employee's performance through a detailed written narrative. Forced distribution evaluation is a method where employees are rated based on a fixed distribution, similar to grading on a curve. Group evaluation, on the other hand, involves managers comparing individual and group performance against organizational standards.

Similar Questions