Nursing Elites

1. How does the high degree of professionalism among nurses impact their willingness to engage in organized strikes?

• A. Nurses often find union activities such as strikes in conflict with the need to serve and protect clients and their profession
• B. Nurses use evidence-based studies that reflect both management and labor views to support participation in unionization
• C. Nurses who strike can be legally punished for abandonment and negligence considered to be professional misconduct
• D. Nurses most often turn to collective bargaining strategies such as strikes to emphasize client's safety initiatives

Correct answer: A

Rationale: The correct answer is A. The high level of professionalism among nurses, as recognized in Gallup polls, often leads them to perceive organized strikes as conflicting with their duty to care for patients and uphold their professional standards. This conflict of interest can cause nurses to be hesitant or reluctant to participate in strikes. Choice B is incorrect because nurses' decision to engage in strikes is more influenced by professional values and patient care rather than evidence-based studies on management and labor views. Choice C is incorrect because while legal consequences may be a concern, the primary factor influencing nurses' decision on strikes is their professional commitment to patient care. Choice D is incorrect as nurses' focus during strikes is more on advocating for patient safety rather than emphasizing safety initiatives.

2. A healthcare professional is interested in locating reliable information concerning non-invasive blood glucose monitoring. Information is found, and the author is a scientist who conducted studies within the last year on the effectiveness of a non-invasive blood glucose monitor. The scientist received funding from a pharmaceutical company to support the studies. The URL indicates the pharmaceutical company excite.com. The healthcare professional is concerned about what component associated with this information?

• A. Accuracy
• B. Currency
• C. Authority
• D. Objectivity

Correct answer: D

Rationale: Objectivity is questioned when there is a potential conflict of interest, such as funding from a pharmaceutical company. In this scenario, the scientist's ties to the pharmaceutical company through funding may introduce bias, affecting the objectivity of the information provided. The author's connection to the pharmaceutical company may influence the objectivity of the research findings, making it essential for the healthcare professional to consider this aspect when evaluating the reliability of the information.

3. When a nurse reads a peer-reviewed nursing journal article recommending a change in caring for a patient with an indwelling urinary catheter, which action demonstrates critical thinking?

• A. Implementing the article's recommendations in caring for a patient with an indwelling urinary catheter
• B. Presenting the journal article to the nurse manager and proposing a revision of the procedure
• C. Seeking additional peer-reviewed articles that corroborate the author's recommendation
• D. Disregarding the article and adhering to the facility's existing procedure

Correct answer: C

Rationale: Critical thinking involves evaluating information from various sources. In this scenario, the nurse displays critical thinking by seeking additional peer-reviewed articles that support the author's recommendation. This action ensures that decisions are based on a comprehensive understanding of the topic rather than relying solely on one source. By exploring other peer-reviewed articles, the nurse can validate the proposed change and make informed decisions regarding patient care. Choice A, implementing the article's recommendations, may not encompass a thorough evaluation of the information presented. Choice B, presenting the article to the nurse manager, is a valid step but does not directly involve critical analysis of the information. Choice D, disregarding the article, goes against the essence of critical thinking, which emphasizes the evaluation and consideration of various perspectives.

4. For what purpose does the nursing student predominantly use knowledge about the history of nursing?

• A. To understand the professional choices open to the student
• B. To prevent medication errors in practice
• C. To determine the optimal geographical area for practice
• D. To reduce the cost of delivering quality health care

Correct answer: A

Rationale: Understanding the history of nursing is essential for nursing students as it enables them to comprehend the various professional paths available in the field. By learning about the evolution of nursing practice, students can gain insights into different specialties, roles, and career opportunities within the nursing profession. This historical knowledge helps students make informed decisions about their future career paths and understand the diversity and possibilities within the nursing profession. Choices B, C, and D are incorrect because the primary purpose of studying the history of nursing is not to prevent medication errors, determine practice locations, or reduce healthcare costs. While these are important aspects of nursing practice, they are not the main reasons for studying the history of nursing.

5. When the new graduate nurse shares a journal article about caring with peers, a more experienced nurse says, 'You’d be a lot better off studying pathophysiology instead of wasting time on caring.' How does the graduate interpret the experienced nurse’s comment?

• A. The experienced nurse is just mean and doesn’t like new graduates.
• B. The experienced nurse is most likely overworked and cranky.
• C. The experienced nurse was educated in the medical model.
• D. The experienced nurse is uncaring and dislikes new graduates.

Correct answer: C

Rationale: The experienced nurse's comment likely reflects their education in the medical model, which emphasizes technical skills over caring. This suggests a difference in educational background rather than personal animosity towards new graduates. Choice A is incorrect as it assumes personal dislike without considering educational differences. Choice B is incorrect as it attributes the behavior to being overworked and cranky, which is not supported by the information given. Choice D is incorrect as it makes a broad assumption about the experienced nurse's character without considering the context of their comment.

Similar Questions