ATI TEAS 7
ATI TEAS 7 Reading Practice Test
1. Which of the following quotes offers the best summary for the instructor's motive in sending the email to the students?
- A. By now, many of you have probably seen your grade and are a little concerned. (And if you're not concerned, you should be-at least a bit!)
- B. With each class comes a new challenge, however, and as any good instructor will tell you, sometimes the original plan has to change.
- C. The purpose of the group project is to allow students to work together and arrive at a stronger response than if each worked individually.
- D. At the beginning of the semester, I informed the class that I have a strict grading policy and that all scores will stand unquestioned.
Correct answer: B
Rationale: The correct answer is B. This quote best captures the instructor's motive in the email to adjust the original plan to better support the students. Dr. Edwards is offering alternative options, including extra credit projects and a group project, to help students improve their scores after the essay exam. These options aim to provide students with opportunities to enhance their grades and succeed in the course. Choice A focuses on students feeling concerned about their grades but does not address the instructor's motive. Choice C highlights the purpose of the group project but does not capture the instructor's motive for sending the email. Choice D emphasizes the instructor's strict grading policy but does not explain the motive behind offering alternative ways to improve scores.
2. Which of the following statements would make the best conclusion to an essay about civil rights activist Rosa Parks?
- A. Rosa Parks refused to give up her bus seat, leading to her arrest.
- B. Rosa Parks was a hero to many, symbolizing the power of ordinary people in bringing about change.
- C. Rosa Parks died in 2005 at the age of 92.
- D. Rosa Parks' actions sparked the Montgomery Bus Boycott, a pivotal event in the Civil Rights Movement.
Correct answer: B
Rationale: The best conclusion to an essay about civil rights activist Rosa Parks should reflect her significance and impact. Choice A, while true, focuses on a specific event rather than summarizing her broader influence. Choice C, though factual, is not a strong conclusion as it does not capture the essence of her legacy. Choice D, although related to her actions, is not as encompassing as Choice B. Option B is the most suitable conclusion as it highlights Rosa Parks' heroism, emphasizing how she inspired change and symbolized the power of ordinary individuals in making a difference.
3. Which of the following choices introduces a specific claim and distinguishes it from counterclaims?
- A. Is texting while driving really a critical safety issue? Are all kinds of distracted driving created equal? What can be said about the nature of distracted driving among teenagers?
- B. It's true that distracted driving is dangerous. There may be nothing more dangerous than texting while driving. Texting while driving has resulted in more than 15,000 deaths and over 200,000 injuries. The majority of texting drivers are teens, although other age groups have been implicated.
- C. Texting while driving is one of the key issues facing young people today: it's a fact that texting drivers have killed over 16,000 people between 2002 and
- D. While some argue that texting while driving is just one form of distracted driving, it stands out as particularly hazardous due to the level of focus it diverts from the road. Studies show that drivers who text are 23 times more likely to be involved in an accident compared to other forms of distracted driving.
Correct answer: B
Rationale: Choice B introduces a specific claim that texting while driving is extremely dangerous by stating that 'there may be nothing more dangerous than texting while driving' and supports this claim with statistics on the number of deaths and injuries caused by texting while driving. It further emphasizes the impact by mentioning that the majority of texting drivers are teens. This approach of providing specific evidence helps to distinguish the claim from counterclaims and strengthens the argument. Choices A, C, and D do not introduce a specific claim supported by factual evidence and fail to distinguish it from potential counterclaims, making them less effective in presenting a strong argument.
4. Based on the passages, what can we infer about the relationship between assault and lethal force?
- A. An act of lethal force always results from a type of assault.
- B. An assault will lead to the use of lethal force by someone.
- C. An assault with deadly intent can lead to an individual using lethal force to preserve their well-being.
- D. If someone uses self-defense in a conflict, it is considered deadly force; if actions or threats are intended, it is classified as assault.
Correct answer: C
Rationale: From the passages provided, it can be inferred that an assault with deadly intent can lead to an individual using lethal force to defend themselves and preserve their well-being. This suggests a relationship between assault with deadly intent and the potential use of lethal force in self-defense situations. Choice A is incorrect because lethal force is not always a direct result of assault, as it depends on the circumstances. Choice B is incorrect as not all assaults lead to the use of lethal force by someone. Choice D is incorrect as the definition of deadly force and assault are distinct, with deadly force typically being used in self-defense situations where there is an immediate threat of severe harm or death.
5. Based on the information in the announcement, what might the reader assume about how the university determined the lunch schedule?
- A. The university arranged the schedule based on the department with the most faculty members.
- B. The university checked with the departments to see when the majority of faculty members would be entering the canteen.
- C. The university checked to see when the most faculty members from each department would be entering the canteen.
- D. The university established different times for each department to reduce crowding in the canteen.
Correct answer: C
Rationale: The university determined the lunch schedule by considering when the most faculty members from each department usually enter the canteen. This information is provided in the announcement where it states that the schedules were recommended based on when members of each department should visit the canteen for lunch. Choice A is incorrect because the schedule was not arranged solely based on the department with the most faculty members. Choice B is incorrect as it implies checking with departments about the majority of faculty members entering the canteen, which is not explicitly mentioned. Choice D is incorrect as it simplifies the university's decision-making process, which involved considering the timing of faculty members from different departments entering the canteen.
Similar Questions
Access More Features
ATI TEAS Premium Plus
$149.99/ 90 days
- Actual ATI TEAS 7 Questions
- 3,000 questions with answers
- 90 days access
ATI TEAS Basic
$99/ 30 days
- 3,000 Questions with answers
- 30 days access