which of the following is true of hypotheses of the form all x are y

ATI TEAS 7

Practice TEAS Test Reading

1. Which of the following is true of hypotheses of the form 'All x are y'?

A. Something that is neither x nor y disproves the hypothesis.
B. Something that is both x and y disproves the hypothesis.
C. Something that is x but not y disproves the hypothesis.
D. Something that is y but not x disproves the hypothesis.

Correct answer: D

Rationale: In hypotheses of the form 'All x are y,' the hypothesis is making a claim that all instances of x also fall under y. Therefore, if something is y but not x, it disproves the hypothesis because it contradicts the assertion that all x are y. Choice A is incorrect because something that is neither x nor y doesn't provide evidence against the hypothesis. Choice B is incorrect because if something is both x and y, it actually supports the hypothesis. Choice C is incorrect as something that is x but not y doesn't disprove the hypothesis, as it could still be consistent with the claim that all x are y.

2. Which of the following conclusions is well supported by the passage?

A. The Human Resources team will take longer than initially stated to review candidates and schedule interviews for the position of Lead Technician.
B. Mr. Morgan is well qualified for the position of Lead Technician and will likely be offered an interview.
C. The Human Resources team may struggle to find a suitable candidate for the position of Lead Technician due to the high number of applications received.
D. Mr. Morgan will patiently wait for further communication from the Human Resources team regarding his application for the position of Lead Technician.

Correct answer: B

Rationale: The passage mentions that Mr. Morgan's application for the position of Lead Technician has been received, along with a higher-than-expected number of applications. It also states that the Human Resources team will take longer than previously stated to review candidates and schedule interviews. While there is no direct mention of Mr. Morgan's qualifications or the likelihood of him being offered an interview, it can be inferred that his interest in the position and the competitive application pool suggest that he is well qualified and stands a good chance of being offered an interview. Therefore, the most supported conclusion is that Mr. Morgan is well qualified for the position of Lead Technician and will likely be offered an interview. Choice A is incorrect because the passage does not mention the specific timeframe within which Mr. Morgan was informed about receiving feedback. Choice C is not directly supported by the passage as it does not indicate any challenges in finding a qualified candidate. Choice D is not directly addressed in the passage and is speculative.

3. Which of the following best describes the way the passages are structured?

A. Both passages open by defining a legal concept and then continue to describe situations in order to further explain the concept.
B. Both passages begin with situations, introduce accepted definitions, and then cite legal ramifications.
C. The first passage presents a long definition while the second passage begins by showing an example of assault.
D. Both cite specific legal doctrines, then proceed to explain the rulings.

Correct answer: A

Rationale: The passages are structured in a way where both begin by defining a legal concept (assault and battery) and then provide further explanations and examples to help clarify and elaborate on the concepts. Both passages open with a clear definition and then proceed to discuss the concept in various situations. Choice A is correct because it accurately captures the structure of the passages. Choice B is incorrect because the passages do not introduce accepted definitions after presenting situations; they define the legal concepts first. Choice C is incorrect because the first passage does not present a long definition, it begins by defining lethal force and then provides examples. Choice D is incorrect because while the passages explain legal concepts, they do not specifically cite legal doctrines or explain rulings.

4. Which of the following best expresses the meaning of "intelligence (instinct)" in the context of this passage?

A. Instinct is synonymous with intelligence in the passage.
B. Intelligence and instinct are not clearly distinct in the context.
C. Instinct is a natural ability to perform actions without learned behavior.
D. Instinct refers to an animal's natural survival mechanism.

Correct answer: A

Rationale: Instinct refers to natural, unlearned behaviors, particularly in survival and reproduction.

5. Which of the following most accurately describes how the argument proceeds?

A. The argument proceeds by stating a conclusion, then providing supporting evidence.
B. The argument proceeds by stating several facts and drawing a conclusion.
C. The argument proceeds by offering a premise, then refuting it.
D. The argument proceeds by making a comparison between two subjects.

Correct answer: A

Rationale: The correct answer is A. The argument in the text proceeds by stating a conclusion ('Dwight is the best employee') and then providing supporting evidence ('The top salesman is always the best employee'). This aligns with choice A, where the argument is structured by stating a conclusion first and then offering supporting evidence. Choices B, C, and D are incorrect because the argument in the text does not simply present facts and draw a conclusion, offer a premise and then refute it, or make a comparison between two subjects.