Nursing Elites

1. What is an important nursing intervention for a child with a newly inserted central venous catheter?

• A. Regularly monitor for signs of infection
• B. Administer intravenous fluids only as ordered
• C. Restrict the child's movement
• D. Perform daily dressing changes only

Correct answer: A

Rationale: Regularly monitoring for signs of infection is a critical nursing intervention for a child with a newly inserted central venous catheter. This intervention is essential to detect any early signs of infection, such as redness, swelling, or drainage at the catheter site, which can lead to serious complications like sepsis. Administering intravenous fluids as ordered is important but not the most crucial intervention for a newly inserted central venous catheter. Restricting the child's movement is unnecessary unless specified by the healthcare provider. Performing daily dressing changes alone is not sufficient to ensure the catheter's integrity and the child's safety; monitoring for signs of infection is key.

2. You have been asked to help a top nutrition researcher conduct human experiments on vitamin C. As the subjects walk into the laboratory, you distribute all the vitamin C pill bottles to the girls and all the placebo pill bottles to the boys. What should you have done?

• A. Giving all the boys the vitamin C and the girls the placebo, and telling them what they were getting.
• B. Distributing the bottles randomly, randomizing the subjects, and telling them what they were getting.
• C. Telling the subjects which group they were in, but preventing yourself from knowing the contents of the pill bottles.
• D. Preventing yourself from knowing what is in the pill bottles, and distributing the bottles randomly to the subjects.

Correct answer: D

Rationale: The correct approach in a scientific experiment is to prevent yourself from knowing the contents of the pill bottles and distribute them randomly to the subjects. This randomization helps to avoid bias and ensures that the results are not influenced by preconceived notions. Option A is incorrect because it introduces gender bias by assigning pills based on gender. Option B is incorrect as it mentions telling the subjects what they are getting, which could lead to placebo effects. Option C is incorrect as it suggests disclosing group information to the subjects, which can also introduce bias.

3. What is an important consideration when caring for a child with epilepsy?

• A. Adherence to prescribed anticonvulsant medication
• B. Avoiding all forms of exercise
• C. Limiting social interactions
• D. Increasing dietary caffeine intake

Correct answer: A

Rationale: Adherence to prescribed anticonvulsant medication is crucial when caring for a child with epilepsy. It is essential for managing the condition effectively and reducing the frequency of seizures. Choice B is incorrect because exercise, when done safely and under supervision, can be beneficial for children with epilepsy by promoting overall health. Choice C is incorrect as social interactions are important for the child's emotional well-being and should not be limited. Choice D is incorrect as increasing dietary caffeine intake can potentially trigger seizures in some individuals with epilepsy.

4. What is one benefit of using a large sample size in an experiment?

• A. Chance variation is less likely to affect the results.
• B. The possibility of a placebo effect is eliminated.
• C. The experiment will be double-blind.
• D. The control group will be similar to the experimental group.

Correct answer: A

Rationale: Corrected Rationale: Using a large sample size reduces the likelihood of chance variation affecting the results, providing more reliable data. Choice B is incorrect because the placebo effect is related to participants' beliefs, not sample size. Choice C is incorrect as double-blind refers to a method of reducing bias, not directly related to sample size. Choice D is incorrect because the similarity between the control and experimental groups is not solely dependent on sample size.

5. Why is peer review important in scientific research?

• A. To expedite publication of results.
• B. To facilitate the replication of studies.
• C. To verify the accuracy and validity of research findings.
• D. To enhance the credibility of the research.

Correct answer: C

Rationale: Peer review is crucial in scientific research to verify the accuracy and validity of research findings. By subjecting research papers to evaluation by experts in the field, peer review ensures that the study's methods, results, and conclusions are robust and reliable. This process helps to maintain high standards of quality in scientific publications, providing credibility to the research. Choices A and D are incorrect because the primary purpose of peer review is not to expedite publication or solely enhance credibility; its core function is to validate the research's accuracy and validity. Choice B, while beneficial, is not the primary reason for peer review; replication is a byproduct of the rigorous evaluation of research methods and findings.

Similar Questions