what can one reasonably conclude from the final comment of this passage if he be mr hyde he had thought i should be mr seek

ATI TEAS 7

TEAS Reading Practice Test

1. What can one reasonably conclude from the final comment of this passage? 'If he be Mr. Hyde,' he had thought, 'I should be Mr. Seek.'

A. The speaker is considering changing names.
B. The speaker is experiencing a determination to find Hyde.
C. The speaker has mistakenly been looking for the wrong person.
D. The speaker intends to continue to look for Hyde.

Correct answer: D

Rationale: The correct answer is D. The speaker's final comment indicates a determination to keep looking for Hyde, as he expresses his intention to become 'Mr. Seek' if the other person is indeed 'Mr. Hyde.' This shows that the speaker is persistent in his search for Hyde, as he believes that discovering Hyde's identity could potentially unravel the mystery and clarify his friend's strange behavior. Choices A, B, and C are incorrect because the final comment does not imply a name change, an identity crisis, or a mistaken search but rather a firm decision to continue seeking out Hyde.

2. Which of the following events occurred most recently?

A. Helped found National Geographic Society
B. Developed a metal detector
C. Moved to Canada
D. Invented the telephone

Correct answer: D

Rationale: Alexander Graham Bell invented the telephone after founding the National Geographic Society and developing a metal detector. Therefore, inventing the telephone is the most recent event among the options provided. Moving to Canada occurred earlier than the invention of the telephone, and helping to found the National Geographic Society also happened before the invention of the telephone.

3. Which of the following statements most closely correlates with the definition of the term working man?

A. A working man is not someone who works for institutions or corporations, but someone who is well-versed in the workings of the soul.
B. A working man is someone who is probably not involved in social activities because the physical demand for work is too high.
C. A working man is someone who works for wages among the middle class.
D. The working man has historically taken to the field, to the factory, and now to the screen.

Correct answer: D

Rationale: Option D provides a succinct summary of the historical shifts in the type of work commonly associated with the 'working man.' It references how the working man has transitioned from agricultural fields to factories and eventually to modern society's dependence on technology, represented by the 'screen.' This progression highlights the evolution of labor and the changing landscape of work over time. Choices A, B, and C do not accurately capture the essence of a working man's historical journey through various types of labor and the societal changes that have influenced it.

4. Which of the following represents an opinion statement on the part of the author?

A. According to the CDC, tobacco products cause nearly six million deaths per year.
B. Nicotine addicts sometimes pay more for a pack of cigarettes than gas.
C. They risk staining their teeth and fingers with tar.
D. Smokers tend to stink and create pervasive nastiness.

Correct answer: D

Rationale: The statement 'Smokers tend to stink and create pervasive nastiness' is an opinion since it reflects the author's subjective view on the hygiene and social impact of smoking. The other choices, A, B, and C, are all factual statements based on research or observations without expressing a personal viewpoint. Choice A presents a statistic from the CDC, choice B discusses a comparison related to the cost of cigarettes, and choice C describes a potential consequence of smoking without inserting personal judgment.

5. Which of the following is not a reliable resource for a research paper?

A. The New York Times
B. A personal interview with a politician
C. A medical journal
D. Wikipedia

Correct answer: D

Rationale: Wikipedia is not a reliable source for a research paper due to its open editing format, which may lead to inaccuracies, bias, and lack of authority. While it can be a good starting point for research and general information, it is crucial to verify information from Wikipedia with more academic and reputable sources like peer-reviewed journals, books, or official websites. The New York Times, a personal interview with a politician, and a medical journal are generally considered reliable sources for research papers. The New York Times is a reputable newspaper, personal interviews can provide valuable firsthand insights, and medical journals undergo rigorous peer review processes to ensure accuracy and reliability.