what is the main point of dispute between the politicians
Logo

Nursing Elites

ATI TEAS 7

Reading TEAS Practice Test

1. What is the main point of dispute between the politicians?

Correct answer: B

Rationale: The main point of dispute between the conservative and liberal politicians is about whether certain classes of people rely on social welfare programs to meet their basic needs. The conservative politician believes that no citizens truly need government assistance and that it only makes things easier, while the liberal politician argues that various groups, such as immigrants, single mothers, and the elderly, require a safety net for basic necessities. Choice A is incorrect as it refers to the impact on national debt, which is not the primary point of dispute. Choice C is incorrect as it discusses the consequences of failing to provide social welfare programs, not the main point of disagreement. Choice D is irrelevant as it talks about the backgrounds of the country's leaders, which is not the focus of the dispute between the politicians.

2. To begin developing a position about civil rights for an oral debate, which of the following would be the best source?

Correct answer: C

Rationale: A history textbook detailing civil rights would be the best source to begin developing a position for an oral debate. History textbooks provide a comprehensive and objective overview of events, movements, and perspectives related to civil rights. This makes them a reliable and well-rounded source for gathering information and forming a strong position. Choice A, a blog created by a proponent of civil rights, may offer valuable insights but could be biased or lack the depth and breadth of information provided in a history textbook. Choice B, an interview with someone who took part in a civil rights march, provides a personal perspective which can be valuable but might not cover all aspects or historical contexts of civil rights. Choice D, a speech by a famous civil rights leader, offers inspirational content but may not provide the comprehensive background and multiple viewpoints necessary for a well-rounded position in a debate.

3. Which option best exemplifies an author's use of alliteration and personification?

Correct answer: B

Rationale: Option B, 'It shuddered, swayed, shook, and screamed its way into dust under hot flames,' best exemplifies an author's use of alliteration and personification. The phrase uses alliteration by repeating the 's' sound and personification by attributing human actions like shuddering and screaming to an inanimate object. Options A, C, and D do not contain both alliteration and personification. Option A uses personification but lacks alliteration. Option C uses personification but lacks alliteration. Option D contains personification but lacks alliteration as well.

4. What is one point on which the scientist and politician agree?

Correct answer: B

Rationale: The correct answer is B: 'Global temperatures are increasing.' The scientist and politician both agree on this point based on the context provided. Choice A is incorrect because while it might be a common belief among scientists, the politician's agreement is not explicitly mentioned. Choice C is incorrect as it suggests a course of action rather than a point of agreement. Choice D is incorrect as it contradicts the consensus that global temperatures are currently increasing due to human activities, not just natural climate cycles.

5. Which of the following, if true, would most seriously undermine the explanation proposed by the author in Passage I, third paragraph?

Correct answer: A

Rationale: The correct answer is A because the author in Passage I discusses the concept of lethal force in self-defense being justified and absolved from blame when used as a last resort to prevent severe harm or death. Choice A undermines this by stating that an instance of lethal force in self-defense is not absolutely absolved from blame and highlights that the law considers the necessary use of force at the time it is committed. This challenges the absolute justification of such actions and would seriously undermine the author's argument. Choice B is incorrect because compliance with the law does not necessarily address the justification and absolution of lethal force. Choice C is incorrect as forgiving lethal force in all cases is not the focus of the author's argument. Choice D is incorrect because the intent of the user is a crucial factor in evaluating the use of lethal force, contrary to what is stated.

Similar Questions

What is the new word?
Which of the following is not an example given by the author of an element of the Western paradigm?
Which of the following statements offers a supporting argument for the passage's claim that many coastal islands are eroding?
What is implied by the following sentence? It is hoped the wounds may not be mortal. My apprehension is that they will prove fatal.
How much will Raoul expect to pay for his computer use at the library?

Access More Features

ATI TEAS Premium Plus
$149.99/ 90 days

  • Actual ATI TEAS 7 Questions
  • 3,000 questions with answers
  • 90 days access

ATI TEAS Basic
$99/ 30 days

  • 3,000 Questions with answers
  • 30 days access

Other Courses