ATI TEAS 7
TEAS Reading Questions
1. What is the main argument of this essay?
- A. iPads and Kindles are easier to read than books
- B. The printing press was a great invention
- C. The Internet is how people receive information
- D. Technology will soon replace printed material
Correct answer: D
Rationale: The main argument of the essay is that technology will soon replace printed material, specifically printed books. The passage discusses how the rise of the Internet and electronic devices like the iPad and Kindle are making printed books unnecessary. It presents a progression from oral tradition to printed books and now to digital and electronic options. The essay highlights how the convenience and multi-functionality of devices like the iPad and Kindle will lead to the eventual demise of printed books. Choices A, B, and C are incorrect because while they are mentioned in the essay, they are not the central argument. The essay focuses on the transition from printed material to digital and electronic options, making choice D the correct answer.
2. The phrase 'labyrinths of lamplighted city' contains an example of what?
- A. Hyperbole
- B. Simile
- C. Metaphor
- D. Alliteration
Correct answer: D
Rationale: The correct answer is D, 'Alliteration.' The phrase 'labyrinths of lamplighted city' uses alliteration by repeating the 'l' sound, creating a rhythmic and vivid image of a city illuminated by lamps. Alliteration is the repetition of initial consonant sounds in neighboring words, and in this case, it enhances the description of the city in the reader's mind. Choices A, B, and C are incorrect because there is no exaggeration (hyperbole), comparison using 'like' or 'as' (simile), or direct comparison without using 'like' or 'as' (metaphor) present in the phrase.
3. Which of the following can the reader infer about the author's point of view when they state: 'the work Lamarr and Antheil did creating this frequency-hopping system led to many technologies that are often taken for granted today?'
- A. The author believes that we have underestimated the value of the contributions of lesser-known inventors
- B. The author believes that the frequency-hopping system has damaged the potential of modern electronics
- C. The author believes that the work of Lamarr and Antheil was instrumental to victory in World War II
- D. The author believes we spend too much time using technologies derived from...
Correct answer: A
Rationale: The author highlights the significance of the contributions made by lesser-known inventors like Lamarr and Antheil.
4. Which of the following, if true, would most seriously undermine the explanation proposed by the author in Passage I, third paragraph?
- A. An instance of lethal force in self-defense is not absolutely absolved from blame. The law takes into account the necessary use of force at the time it is committed.
- B. An individual who uses necessary defense under lethal force is in direct compliance with the law under most circumstances.
- C. Lethal force in self-defense should not be forgiven in all cases for the peace of mind of the primary victim.
- D. The use of lethal force is not evaluated based on the intent of the user, but rather the severity of the primary attack that warranted self-defense.
Correct answer: A
Rationale: The correct answer is A because the author in Passage I discusses the concept of lethal force in self-defense being justified and absolved from blame when used as a last resort to prevent severe harm or death. Choice A undermines this by stating that an instance of lethal force in self-defense is not absolutely absolved from blame and highlights that the law considers the necessary use of force at the time it is committed. This challenges the absolute justification of such actions and would seriously undermine the author's argument. Choice B is incorrect because compliance with the law does not necessarily address the justification and absolution of lethal force. Choice C is incorrect as forgiving lethal force in all cases is not the focus of the author's argument. Choice D is incorrect because the intent of the user is a crucial factor in evaluating the use of lethal force, contrary to what is stated.
5. Based on the information in the passage, which of the composers among The Five would the author likely agree was the most influential?
- A. Alexander Glazunov
- B. Modest Mussorgsky
- C. Nikolai Rimsky-Korsakov
- D. Cesar Cui
Correct answer: C
Rationale: The correct answer is C: Nikolai Rimsky-Korsakov. The passage highlights Rimsky-Korsakov's significant influence by mentioning that composers such as Alexander Glazunov, Sergei Prokofiev, and Igor Stravinsky studied under him. This demonstrates that Rimsky-Korsakov had a lasting impact on the development of these renowned composers. Choice A, Alexander Glazunov, is incorrect because the passage states that Glazunov studied under Rimsky-Korsakov, indicating he was influenced by him rather than being the most influential among The Five. Choice B, Modest Mussorgsky, is incorrect as the passage mainly focuses on his works and contributions but does not mention his influence on other composers. Choice D, Cesar Cui, is incorrect as he is considered one of the founders of the movement but is not highlighted for influencing other significant composers as Rimsky-Korsakov is. Therefore, based on the information provided, the author would likely agree that Nikolai Rimsky-Korsakov was the most influential among The Five.
Similar Questions
Access More Features
ATI TEAS Premium Plus
$149.99/ 90 days
- Actual ATI TEAS 7 Questions
- 3,000 questions with answers
- 90 days access
ATI TEAS Basic
$99/ 30 days
- 3,000 Questions with answers
- 30 days access