ATI TEAS 7
ATI TEAS 7 Reading Practice Test
1. Which of the following statements represents an exaggerated claim in support of the argument presented in this passage?
- A. In the United States, the foreign language requirement for high school graduation varies depending on the state.
- B. Studying a foreign language is crucial for success in the global economy.
- C. High school graduates with foreign language credits have a higher college acceptance rate.
- D. Students who did not study a foreign language are completely unable to secure any job.
Correct answer: D
Rationale: The correct answer is D because it is an exaggerated claim to state that students who did not study a foreign language are completely unable to secure any job. While proficiency in a foreign language may enhance job prospects, it is unrealistic to suggest that not studying one would render someone unemployable. Choice A provides a factual statement about the variation in foreign language requirements, so it cannot be considered an exaggeration. Choices B and C highlight the increasing importance of foreign language skills and the benefits of having them, which are supported by trends and studies. These choices may be debatable, but they are not exaggerated claims.
2. Which of the following best captures the author’s purpose?
- A. to advocate for specific ideals and beliefs
- B. to discuss the role of skin coloration and markings in snakes
- C. to explain the influence of idealism on American social and political discourse
- D. to examine the impact of snake behavior on the ecosystem
Correct answer: C
Rationale: The author's main purpose in the passage is to explain the influence of idealism on American social and political discourse. The passage discusses how idealistic viewpoints shape the discourse in America, advocating for specific ideals and beliefs (A) rather than explaining the beliefs of an idealist (B) or examining the impact of snake behavior on the ecosystem (D).
3. Which of the following words from the sentence above has a negative connotation?
- A. Contained
- B. Shocked
- C. Complimentary
- D. Reportedly
Correct answer: B
Rationale: The word 'shocked' has a negative connotation as it implies a strong feeling of surprise or dismay. In the context of the provided extract, the word 'shocked' would be fitting to describe the reaction of individuals witnessing the sudden outbreak of violence during the skirmish at Lexington and Concord. The other choices do not carry a negative connotation in this context: 'Contained' is neutral, 'Complimentary' is positive, and 'Reportedly' is neutral.
4. Which one of the following statements might be accurately inferred based on the above passage?
- A. The famous children's author produced a lesser-quality book under her pseudonym.
- B. The famous children's author has expertise in Antebellum America.
- C. The famous children's author did not receive adequate publicity for her historical novel.
- D. Historical fiction novels are more popular than children's series.
Correct answer: C
Rationale: The correct answer is C. The passage mentions that the author published a historical fiction novel under a pseudonym, which received critical acclaim but did not sell as well as her children's books. This indicates that the author did not receive adequate publicity for her historical novel, as it did not reach the same level of popularity as her children's books. Choices A and B are incorrect as there is no mention of the quality of the book produced under the pseudonym or the author's expertise in Antebellum America. Choice D is also incorrect as the passage does not compare the overall popularity of historical fiction novels to children's series.
5. What is the main point of dispute between the politicians?
- A. Spending on social welfare programs increases the national debt.
- B. Certain classes of people rely on social welfare programs to meet their basic needs.
- C. Certain classes of people would be irreparably harmed if the country failed to provide a social welfare program.
- D. All of the country's leaders have bootstrapped their way to the top.
Correct answer: B
Rationale: The main point of dispute between the conservative and liberal politicians is about whether certain classes of people rely on social welfare programs to meet their basic needs. The conservative politician believes that no citizens truly need government assistance and that it only makes things easier, while the liberal politician argues that various groups, such as immigrants, single mothers, and the elderly, require a safety net for basic necessities. Choice A is incorrect as it refers to the impact on national debt, which is not the primary point of dispute. Choice C is incorrect as it discusses the consequences of failing to provide social welfare programs, not the main point of disagreement. Choice D is irrelevant as it talks about the backgrounds of the country's leaders, which is not the focus of the dispute between the politicians.
Similar Questions
Access More Features
ATI TEAS Premium Plus
$149.99/ 90 days
- Actual ATI TEAS 7 Questions
- 3,000 questions with answers
- 90 days access
ATI TEAS Basic
$1/ 30 days
- 3,000 Questions with answers
- 30 days access