ATI TEAS 7
ATI TEAS 7 Reading Practice Test
1. Which of the following statements represents an exaggerated claim in support of the argument presented in this passage?
- A. In the United States, the foreign language requirement for high school graduation varies depending on the state.
- B. Studying a foreign language is crucial for success in the global economy.
- C. High school graduates with foreign language credits have a higher college acceptance rate.
- D. Students who did not study a foreign language are completely unable to secure any job.
Correct answer: D
Rationale: The correct answer is D because it is an exaggerated claim to state that students who did not study a foreign language are completely unable to secure any job. While proficiency in a foreign language may enhance job prospects, it is unrealistic to suggest that not studying one would render someone unemployable. Choice A provides a factual statement about the variation in foreign language requirements, so it cannot be considered an exaggeration. Choices B and C highlight the increasing importance of foreign language skills and the benefits of having them, which are supported by trends and studies. These choices may be debatable, but they are not exaggerated claims.
2. What can the reader conclude from the passage above?
- A. The kingsnake is dangerous to humans.
- B. The coral snake and the kingsnake are both hunted by the same predators.
- C. It's safe to handle snakes in the woods because you can easily tell whether they're poisonous.
- D. The kingsnake changes its markings when hawks or eagles are close by.
Correct answer: B
Rationale: The correct answer is B. The passage explains that the kingsnake mimics the venomous coral snake's markings to deter predators, particularly hawks and eagles, which cannot differentiate between the two species. This implies that both the coral snake and the kingsnake face similar threats from predators in their shared habitat. Choice A is incorrect because the passage clearly states that the kingsnake is nonvenomous, so it is not dangerous to humans. Choice C is incorrect as the passage highlights that not all snakes with flashy markings are venomous, emphasizing the need for caution. Choice D is incorrect as there is no mention of the kingsnake changing its markings in response to the presence of hawks or eagles in the passage.
3. What is the main point of dispute between the politicians?
- A. Spending on social welfare programs increases the national debt.
- B. Certain classes of people rely on social welfare programs to meet their basic needs.
- C. Certain classes of people would be irreparably harmed if the country failed to provide a social welfare program.
- D. All of the country's leaders have bootstrapped their way to the top.
Correct answer: B
Rationale: The main point of dispute between the conservative and liberal politicians is about whether certain classes of people rely on social welfare programs to meet their basic needs. The conservative politician believes that no citizens truly need government assistance and that it only makes things easier, while the liberal politician argues that various groups, such as immigrants, single mothers, and the elderly, require a safety net for basic necessities. Choice A is incorrect as it refers to the impact on national debt, which is not the primary point of dispute. Choice C is incorrect as it discusses the consequences of failing to provide social welfare programs, not the main point of disagreement. Choice D is irrelevant as it talks about the backgrounds of the country's leaders, which is not the focus of the dispute between the politicians.
4. What is one idea that the students above seem to agree on, based on their statements?
- A. Students should be allowed to express themselves through their apparel.
- B. Schools should give students a certain amount of respect.
- C. Students should focus more on school than on their appearance.
- D. Schools would violate students' basic rights by enforcing a dress code.
Correct answer: B
Rationale: Both Lisa Grant and Vivian Harris express the idea that schools should give students a certain amount of respect. Lisa Grant believes that wearing uniforms would help students respect each other based on ideas and character rather than appearance. Vivian Harris, on the other hand, argues against uniforms, emphasizing that clothing is crucial for self-expression and taking it away suppresses students' rights. However, at the core of both their arguments is the underlying theme of advocating for respect towards students.
5. To whom is this passage probably being written?
- A. a mother
- B. a father
- C. a babysitter
- D. a nurse
Correct answer: C
Rationale: The passage provides detailed instructions on how to take care of a little girl, indicating that the intended audience is someone other than the child's parents. A babysitter is the most likely recipient of these instructions, as they are typically hired to care for children when the parents are away. The specific guidance on feeding, naptime routine, and other care tasks align with what a babysitter would need to know to care for a child in place of the parents. Choices A, B, and D are incorrect because the passage does not address the child's parents directly. It focuses on providing guidance to someone temporarily responsible for the child's care, such as a babysitter.
Similar Questions
Access More Features
ATI TEAS Premium Plus
$149.99/ 90 days
- Actual ATI TEAS 7 Questions
- 3,000 questions with answers
- 90 days access
ATI TEAS Basic
$99/ 30 days
- 3,000 Questions with answers
- 30 days access