Nursing Elites

1. Which of the following is required in order for a healthcare provider to be legally justified in not attempting to save a client's life?

• A. A 'Do Not Resuscitate' (DNR) statement on the patient's care plan
• B. A 'No-Code' sign or symbol placed at the patient's bedside
• C. A 'No-Code' order written and signed on the physician's order sheet
• D. The next of kin's request for 'Do Not Resuscitate' orally or in writing

Correct answer: C

Rationale: To legally justify not attempting to save a client's life, a healthcare provider must have a 'No-Code' order written and signed on the physician's order sheet. Unless there is a specific order stating that resuscitation should not be performed, failure to do so can be considered negligence. A 'Do Not Resuscitate' statement on the care plan or a symbol at the bedside is not legally valid without the proper medical order. Additionally, a request from the next of kin, whether oral or written, is not a substitute for a signed physician's order.

2. During a busy shift, a registered nurse directed an unlicensed care provider to change the dressing and perform wound care on an older adult client's surgical incision, an act that exists outside of the unlicensed care provider's scope of practice. Which of the following statements best captures the legal context of this event?

• A. The unlicensed care provider is solely responsible for the inappropriate practice.
• B. The nurse can be held liable for the actions of the unlicensed care provider.
• C. Liability rests with the nurse manager of the unit.
• D. In the absence of documented harm to the client, the action is legally permissible.

Correct answer: B

Rationale: The correct answer is B. Under the doctrine of respondent superior, nurses can be held liable for the actions of individuals under their supervision. In this scenario, the registered nurse directed the unlicensed care provider to perform a task outside their scope of practice, making the nurse accountable for the consequences. Choice A is incorrect because the responsibility is shared between the nurse and the unlicensed care provider. Choice C is incorrect as the nurse manager may not be directly responsible for the actions of the registered nurse. Choice D is incorrect because legality is not determined solely by the absence of harm; acting within one's legal scope of practice is essential to ensure patient safety.

3. A newly hired nurse is being orientated in a community health center that provides care to the adjacent large Native American reservation/Canadian aboriginal reserve. Which statement by the nurse indicates a sound understanding of the Native American/First Nations population?

• A. I suppose that we will see a disproportionately high number of clients with lung and oral cancers.
• B. The high prevalence of diabetes and hypertension mean that strokes are likely to be relatively frequent in the area.
• C. It is unfortunate that many of the older Native Americans/First Nations people are unlikely to have family members involved in their care.
• D. The unique skin pigmentation of Native Americans/First Nations people means that I will have to modify my assessment techniques.

Correct answer: B

Rationale: Diabetes, hypertension, and stroke are all higher than average in Native American/First Nations adults. Lung and oral cancers are not noted to have a higher prevalence and family is likely to be involved in the care of these older adults. The skin tone of Native American/First Nations people is not noted to require specific assessment techniques. The Native American population may have close family bonds.

4. Mr. K has dementia. Having a good deal of money, he has a private room at Haven Nursing Home. He is a retired industrialist whose children and current wife are already squabbling bitterly over his estate. During visits, they often get into shouting matches that disturb the other residents and Mr. K himself. How should an administrator handle this family?

• A. Emphasize that they must behave civilly when visiting
• B. Have them set up separate visiting schedules
• C. Ask them to stay away
• D. Close Mr. K's door when they visit

Correct answer: B

Rationale: There is little an administrator can do about this dysfunctional family's behavior, but Mr. K should not be upset by it, and the other residents deserve to be protected from shouting. By setting up separate visiting schedules, the family can continue to provide needed support for their husband and father. If they accidentally visit at the same time, the door can be kept closed until they leave.

5. How does guardianship differ from power of attorney?

• A. The court appoints a guardian; an individual grants a power of attorney to someone else to make decisions on his or her behalf.
• B. Guardianship is legally binding whether or not an individual is competent; power of attorney applies only to the incompetent.
• C. Courts monitor the actions of those executing a power of attorney, but guardians are free to act on behalf of another as long as standards of 'reasonable prudence' are met.
• D. Guardianship stays in effect for one calendar year and must be renewed annually; power of attorney stays in effect until one or both parties choose to revoke it.

Correct answer: A

Rationale: The correct answer is A. The key difference between guardianship and power of attorney is that the court appoints a guardian to make decisions on behalf of an individual who is deemed incompetent, while an individual grants a power of attorney to someone else to make decisions on their behalf when they are competent. Choice B is incorrect because both guardianship and power of attorney can apply to individuals who are competent or incompetent. Choice C is incorrect as guardians, like those with power of attorney, must act in the best interest of the individual they represent, and the level of oversight can vary. Choice D is incorrect as guardianship and power of attorney do not have fixed time limits; they remain in effect until revoked or ended by the appropriate legal process.

Similar Questions