Nursing Elites

1. What does the author imply will happen if people do not follow his suggestions?

• A. The author implies we will run out of resources in the next 10 years.
• B. The author implies water and energy prices will rise sharply in the near future.
• C. The author implies global warming and the depletion of natural resources will continue.
• D. The author implies local farmers will lose their farms.

Correct answer: C

Rationale: The author implies that neglecting the recommended actions will lead to the continued degradation of the environment and depletion of resources. The passage emphasizes the importance of being proactive in conserving resources to combat global warming and the depletion of natural resources. Choice A is incorrect because the author doesn't specify a timeframe for running out of resources. Choice B is incorrect as the focus is on environmental impact rather than economic consequences. Choice D is incorrect as the passage does not specifically mention the impact on local farmers.

2. Why does Bobo, despite coulrophobia, book more shows and make more money than Gob?

• A. Bobo is an experienced clown.
• B. Despite rampant coulrophobia, statistical data shows that people generally prefer clowns to magicians for children's birthday parties.
• C. Bobo goes out of his way to appear non-threatening.
• D. Bobo works in a densely populated city, while Gob works in a rural town.

Correct answer: B

Rationale: The correct answer is B because despite the widespread fear of clowns (coulrophobia), statistical data indicates that people typically favor clowns over magicians for children's birthday parties. This preference results in Bobo booking more shows and earning more money than Gob. Choice A is incorrect because being an experienced clown alone does not address the paradox. Choice C is incorrect as the statement does not directly relate to the preference for clowns over magicians. Choice D is irrelevant to the paradox as the location of their work does not explain why Bobo is more successful despite coulrophobia.

3. What is a secondary argument the author makes?

• A. Devices such as the iPad or Kindle are better than books because they have multiple uses.
• B. Books are still important to have while waiting for an appointment or taking a flight.
• C. Printed encyclopedias are still used and more convenient than using the Internet.
• D. With technology, there will soon be no need for stories.

Correct answer: A

Rationale: The secondary argument made by the author is that devices such as the iPad and Kindle are superior to printed books because they offer multiple functions beyond just reading. The author mentions that these devices have qualities similar to a computer and can be used for much more than just reading, making them a more versatile option compared to traditional books. Choice B is incorrect because the author does not emphasize the importance of books for specific situations like waiting for appointments or flights. Choice C is incorrect as the author does not compare printed encyclopedias to the Internet. Choice D is incorrect as the author does not suggest that technology will eliminate the need for stories; instead, they focus on the transition from printed books to electronic devices for reading.

4. Which of the following can the reader infer about the author's point of view when they state: 'the work Lamarr and Antheil did creating this frequency-hopping system led to many technologies that are often taken for granted today?'

• A. The author believes that we have underestimated the value of the contributions of lesser-known inventors
• B. The author believes that the frequency-hopping system has damaged the potential of modern electronics
• C. The author believes that the work of Lamarr and Antheil was instrumental to victory in World War II
• D. The author believes we spend too much time using technologies derived from...

Correct answer: A

Rationale: The author highlights the significance of the contributions made by lesser-known inventors like Lamarr and Antheil.

5. From the extract, what is the author's point of view?

• A. First person
• B. Third person limited
• C. Third person omniscient
• D. Objective

Correct answer: C

Rationale: The correct answer is C, third person omniscient. The author provides insight into the thoughts of multiple characters, such as Michael and Lana June, indicating knowledge beyond what a single character could perceive. This omniscient viewpoint allows readers to understand the perspectives of different individuals, enhancing the depth and complexity of the narrative. Choices A, B, and D are incorrect because the extract demonstrates a narrative style that extends beyond a single character's viewpoint, revealing thoughts and feelings of various characters.

Similar Questions