caret carrot and to two and too share something in common they

ATI TEAS 7

TEAS English Questions

1. Caret, carrot, and to, two, and too share something in common. They:

A. Are nouns
B. Are monosyllabic
C. Are homophones
D. Represent things in nature

Correct answer: C

Rationale: The correct answer is C. Caret, carrot, and to, two, and too are all examples of homophones. Homophones are words that sound alike but have different meanings and spellings. In this case, while these words are spelled differently and have different meanings, they are pronounced the same way. Choices A, B, and D are incorrect because these words being discussed do not all fall under the same grammatical category as nouns, monosyllabic words, or representations of things in nature. The commonality among these words lies in being homophones, not in being nouns, monosyllabic, or representations of nature.

2. Based on the words transfer, transact, translation, transport, what is the meaning of the prefix trans?

A. Separation
B. All, everywhere
C. Forward
D. Across, beyond, over

Correct answer: D

Rationale: The prefix 'trans-' in words such as transfer, transact, translation, and transport signifies movement or change from one place, state, or form to another. It indicates going across, beyond, or over something, connecting the original state to a different one. Choice A, 'Separation,' is incorrect as the prefix 'trans-' does not imply separation but rather movement or change between states. Choice B, 'All, everywhere,' is incorrect as the prefix does not convey a sense of being all-encompassing but rather focuses on the action of crossing or changing. Choice C, 'Forward,' is incorrect as the prefix 'trans-' is more about moving across or beyond rather than strictly forward.

3. Which sentence uses the modal verb 'should' correctly?

A. You should have studied harder for the exam.
B. I should be going now.
C. She said she should have taken a different route.
D. They should be arriving any minute now.

Correct answer: B

Rationale: The modal verb 'should' is used to imply an intention or expectation in the present or near future. Option B, 'I should be going now,' correctly conveys such a meaning, indicating the speaker's intention to leave at the current moment. Choices A, C, and D refer to past actions or future arrivals, which do not align with the appropriate usage of 'should' in this context. Therefore, option B is the only sentence that uses the modal verb 'should' correctly.

4. When a researcher submits a paper for publication in a scientific journal, the editors give it to other scientists to review. Which of the following options best uses grammar to combine the sentences above for clarity?

A. When a researcher submits a paper for publication in a scientific journal, the editors give it to other scientists to review.
B. The editors give it to other scientists after a researcher submits a paper for publication in a scientific journal, and they review it.
C. A researcher submits a paper for publication in a scientific journal, and then the scientists review the paper because the editors gave it to other scientists.
D. The scientists review the paper after the editors give it to them when a researcher submits a paper for publication in a scientific journal.

Correct answer: A

Rationale: The correct answer is A: "When a researcher submits a paper for publication in a scientific journal, the editors give it to other scientists to review." This option provides a clear and concise way to combine the two sentences. It maintains the logical sequence of events: first, the researcher submits the paper, and then the editors pass it to other scientists for review. Option B introduces unnecessary complexity by separating the actions in a less fluid manner. Option C confuses the sequence of events by implying that the scientists review the paper because the editors already gave it to them, which is not the intended order of actions. Option D also disrupts the chronological order of events by placing the scientists' review before the editors give them the paper, making it less clear and accurate compared to the correct answer, option A.

5. Which sentence uses correct punctuation?

A. I cooked so I could eat dinner.
B. I cooked so, I could eat dinner.
C. I cooked so I, could eat dinner.
D. I cooked, so I could eat dinner.

Correct answer: D

Rationale: The correct answer is sentence D: 'I cooked, so I could eat dinner.' This sentence uses a comma correctly to separate two independent clauses, 'I cooked,' and 'so I could eat dinner.' Choice A is incorrect as it lacks punctuation to separate the clauses properly. Choice B incorrectly uses a comma after 'so,' disrupting the flow of the sentence. Choice C incorrectly places a comma after 'I,' which is not needed in this context.