Nursing Elites

1. Which of the following types of language is acceptable in a research paper?

• A. Colloquialisms
• B. Contractions
• C. Relative pronouns
• D. Second-person point of view

Correct answer: C

Rationale: Relative pronouns are acceptable in a research paper for connecting clauses. Colloquialisms (choice A) are informal expressions that are not suitable for academic writing. Contractions (choice B) are considered too casual for a research paper. The second-person point of view (choice D) should be avoided in research papers as it can make the writing less objective and scholarly.

2. Identify the determiner in the following sentence:

• A. happily
• B. branches
• C. few
• D. tree

Correct answer: C

Rationale: The determiner in the sentence is 'few.' Determiners specify the quantity or identity of a noun. In this case, 'few' indicates the number of birds present. Choice A, 'happily,' is an adverb modifying a verb or an adjective, not a determiner. Choice B, 'branches,' is a noun referring to parts of a tree, not a determiner. Choice D, 'tree,' is a noun identifying the main subject of the sentence, not a determiner.

3. Which of the following sentences uses correct punctuation?

• A. Carole is not currently working; her focus is on her children at the moment.
• B. Carole is not currently working, and her focus is on her children at the moment.
• C. Carole is not currently working; her focus is on her children at the moment.
• D. Carole is not currently working, her focus is on her children at the moment.

Correct answer: A

Rationale: Option A uses correct punctuation by correctly utilizing the semicolon to separate two closely related independent clauses. This punctuation choice effectively conveys the relationship between the two ideas presented in the sentence. Choice B is incorrect because it uses a comma without a coordinating conjunction to join two independent clauses. Choice C is incorrect as it lacks the coordinating conjunction 'and' after the comma to connect the two independent clauses. Choice D is incorrect because it lacks any punctuation or conjunction to properly separate the two independent clauses, leading to a run-on sentence.

4. What is crucial in technical writing?

• A. Using informal language to connect with the audience.
• B. Emphasizing your expertise with complex jargon.
• C. Explaining concepts clearly and concisely for diverse readers.
• D. Prioritizing creativity and artistic flair in your writing style.

Correct answer: C

Rationale: In technical writing, the primary goal is to explain complex concepts clearly and concisely for diverse readers. Using informal language (Choice A) can undermine the professionalism and clarity expected in technical documents. Emphasizing expertise with complex jargon (Choice B) may alienate readers who are not familiar with technical terminology. Prioritizing creativity and artistic flair (Choice D) may be misleading in technical writing, as the focus should be on clarity and accuracy rather than creative expression. Therefore, the correct choice is to explain concepts clearly and concisely for diverse readers, ensuring that the content is easily understandable and accessible.

5. In the sentence, 'The receptionist explained that we would be the next to see the doctor,' which of the following is the complete predicate?

• A. explained that we would be the next to see the doctor
• B. next to see the doctor
• C. explained that we would be next
• D. see the doctor

Correct answer: A

Rationale: The complete predicate is 'explained that we would be the next to see the doctor.' In a sentence, the complete predicate includes the main verb (explained) and all the words that complete its meaning (that we would be the next to see the doctor). Choices B, C, and D do not constitute the complete predicate as they do not include the main verb 'explained' and all associated words that complete its meaning.

Similar Questions