Nursing Elites

1. When in doubt about using restraints on an agitated patient, it is prudent for nurses to:

• A. Restrain the patient for their own safety
• B. Use minor restraints such as a bed side rail or a tray on a wheelchair
• C. Use alternatives such as a bed alarm with increased staff supervision
• D. Avoid using any device or procedure to limit liability

Correct answer: C

Rationale: The correct answer is C: 'Use alternatives such as a bed alarm with increased staff supervision.' The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA) established strict standards on restraint use in long-term care facilities. Restraints can be considered a form of false imprisonment and neglect, leading to potential litigation. Therefore, it is advisable to avoid restraints whenever possible. A bed alarm coupled with enhanced staff supervision provides an effective and non-restrictive approach for managing an agitated patient. Choices A, B, and D are incorrect because restraining the patient, using minor restraints, or avoiding all devices without providing an alternative can pose risks to patient safety, violate regulations, or increase liability concerns.

2. Why might nurses not be the best choice to obtain informed consent from patients?

• A. Nurses may be tempted to influence the patient's decision in subtle ways.
• B. Nurses may not be able to answer some of the medical questions the patient asks.
• C. A signature obtained by anyone other than a physician will not stand up in court.
• D. Under the law, nurses are only allowed to act as witnesses to informed consent signatures.

Correct answer: B

Rationale: Nurses may not have the medical expertise to answer all the questions that patients may have regarding their treatment, which is a crucial aspect of obtaining informed consent. While nurses should not influence a patient's decision, it is not a major reason why they should not obtain informed consent. Signatures obtained by nurses are legally binding, and although nurses often act as witnesses, there is no legal restriction preventing them from obtaining informed consent itself.

3. Which of the following is required in order for a healthcare provider to be legally justified in not attempting to save a client's life?

• A. A 'Do Not Resuscitate' (DNR) statement on the patient's care plan
• B. A 'No-Code' sign or symbol placed at the patient's bedside
• C. A 'No-Code' order written and signed on the physician's order sheet
• D. The next of kin's request for 'Do Not Resuscitate' orally or in writing

Correct answer: C

Rationale: To legally justify not attempting to save a client's life, a healthcare provider must have a 'No-Code' order written and signed on the physician's order sheet. Unless there is a specific order stating that resuscitation should not be performed, failure to do so can be considered negligence. A 'Do Not Resuscitate' statement on the care plan or a symbol at the bedside is not legally valid without the proper medical order. Additionally, a request from the next of kin, whether oral or written, is not a substitute for a signed physician's order.

4. Nurse R works on the geriatric medicine unit of the university hospital and provides care for numerous older adult clients nearing the end of life, many of whom have no-code orders. Which of the following situations is incompatible with the legal requirements for a no-code order?

• A. A client who is mentally competent has declared his wish to have a no-code order despite the availability of treatment options for his condition.
• B. A client has expressed her desire to have a no-code order but her daughter is adamantly opposed to it.
• C. A client clearly tells the nurse her desire to have a no-code order, which the nurse documents at the bedside.
• D. A client has been in a coma and the family has decided to put in place a no-code order.

Correct answer: C

Rationale: The correct answer is C. No-code orders require a written and signed order by a physician. Therefore, a client expressing the desire for a no-code order to a nurse, without a documented physician's order, is incompatible with legal requirements. Choices A and B are not incompatible as competent clients can make their own decisions, regardless of treatment options or family opposition. Choice D is also not incompatible as family decisions can be made on behalf of incompetent clients.

5. Which of the following statements most accurately captures an aspect of contemporary family caregiving in the United States?

• A. Women typically spend more time caring for aging parents than they did for their own children.
• B. The most common pattern of care involves an older man providing in-home care for his wife.
• C. The majority of care is now provided by public and private agencies rather than family members.
• D. A residential or institutional environment is now the most common venue for caregiving.

Correct answer: A

Rationale: The correct answer is A. Today, on average, women spend more time providing care for their aging parents than they did for their own children. While some men provide care for their wives, it is not the most common pattern. Family members, rather than public or private agencies, still provide the majority of care in a non-institutional environment, making option C incorrect. Also, caregiving in a residential or institutional environment is not the most common venue, thus choice D is inaccurate.

Similar Questions